|
Cage's musical vocabulary was also
influenced by the historical avant-garde. His percussion works
(and similar compositions for the same medium by such composers
as William Russell, Edgard Varèse, Lou Harrison, and Henry
Cowell) gave noise a new musical vitality that went far beyond
the dadaist and futurist experiments. Even more important was
Cage's interest in breaking down the barriers between art and
life, a position often attributed to his studies of Zen Buddhism
which also shows unmistakeable parallels with the historical
avant-garde. Cage exemplified this aesthetic philosophy with
4'33", perhaps his most crucial contribution to the
mid-century revival of avant-garde aesthetics. The description
of 4'33"--the musical analog for Robert Rauschenberg's
white canvases--as a composition without sound is misleading.
4'33" was not merely a philosophical statement without
any real musical content. Cage has maintained that an audience
experiencing 4'33" has an opportunity to listen,
in an aesthetic way, to what there is to hear.[27] He believed
that we are all free at any time and in any place to listen,
in a musical way, to the sounds that are around us. He eliminated
the distinction between musical and environmental sound, thus
achieving a fusion of art and life in a musical context.
These interests drew Cage to many of
the techniques developed by the dadaist movement such as simultaneity
and chance methods. At Black Mountain College in 1952, Cage staged
a now famous performance consisting of several unrelated activities
including Merce Cunningham's dancing, David Tudor's piano playing,
poetry recitals by Charles Olsen and M. C. Richards, Robert Rauchenberg
playing an old fashioned record player, and Cage's own reading
from a text by the fourteenth-century mystic and philosopher
Meister Eckhardt. This work looked back to the dadaist and futurist
performances and also anticipated both the "happenings"
that became popular during the 1960s and the "events"
staged by the Fluxus movement.[28] Cage's fascination with complex
simultaneities of this sort extended throughout his entire career,
from his early experiments with electronic media such as Williams
Mix, to the enormous superimposition of electronic and
other musical media in HPSCHD, to later works such as
Cage's Europeras (which although they were perhaps not
intended in the same antagonistic spirit, resemble Marinetti's
plan for a performance at his "Variety Theater" cited
above).
Progress and innovation are necessary claims for an authentic
avant-garde. But was an avant-garde possible "après
Cage"? The challenge of subsequent generations of avant-garde
composers was to discover new modes of musical innovation after
Cage had demonstrated that virtually any combination of sounds
has musical value. This task was taken on beginning in the 1960s
by a group of artists and musicians, many of whom were associated
with the Fluxus movement.
During the late 1950s, Cage taught a course in experimental
music at the New School for Social Research. His students, among
whom were George Brecht, Dick Higgins, Toshi Ichiyanagi, Allan
Kaprow, Jackson Mac Low, and Richard Maxfield, went on to become
leaders within avant-garde artistic circles including the Fluxus
movement. The first official Fluxus concert was held in Wiesbaden
in 1962, and was followed by several other concerts throughout
Europe featuring works by John Cage, George Brecht, Dick Higgins,
La Monte Young, Philip Corner, Nam June Paik, Allison Knowles,
Emmet Williams, and many others. These events were organized
by George Maciunas, a Lithuanian émigré who was
active in the New York avant-grade and largely responsible for
the founding of the Fluxus movement. Maciunas outlined the political
and social program for Fluxus in a manifesto that he distributed
to the audience at the Fluxfest concert in Dusseldorf
in February, 1963. Many of the objectives in the manifesto looked
back to the historical avant-garde. Fluxus rejected institutional
art, was decidedly anti-academic, and against commercialized
culture. Art was for the masses and was a means toward social
and political change. Maciunas modeled Fluxus after the 1920s
Soviet artist collective Left Front for the Arts (Levyi Front
Iskusstv) or LEF.[29] LEF endorsed a form of social realism
that sought the de-aestheticization and de-institutionalization
of art. Artists, according to the precepts endorsed by LEF, had
a social responsibility to enhance the everyday lives of the
masses. They believed that this could be accomplished through
the adornment of utilitarian objects and the mass production
of art sponsored by the state.
As did the dadaists before them, the proponents of Fluxus
believed in the unity of art and life. In his lecture entitled
"Neo-Dada in Music, Theater, Poetry, Art"[30] Maciunas
differentiated between "illusionist" art which is artificial
and abstract and "concrete art" which draws from processes
and materials in the real world. In illusionist art, form and
content are separate since the sounds that are produced are not
readily equated with their manner of production. The concrete
artist prefers noise to so-called musical sounds because the
latter are artificial and do not occur as natural phenomena.
It is more natural to strike a piano with a hammer than it is
to play a Beethoven piano sonata. In the case of the hammer and
piano, form and content are equivalent because the sound produced
is more easily identified with the materials producing the sound.
Maciunas demonstrated concrete sounds with a performance of Nam
June Paik's One for Violin Solo (1962) during which a
violin is destroyed before the audience. Another noteworthy example
is La Monte Young's Poem for Tables, Benches, and Chairs
(1960), which consists of sounds produced by a large group of
performers dragging furniture across a stage.
These works look back to the dadaist and futurist experiments
with noise and most certainly point to Cage's influence. Like
Cage, Fluxus composers rejoiced in the musical potential of unconventional
sounds. They also often strove to inject a humorous component
in their works. Fluxus events and compositions were meant to
be unpretentious "art-amusement" based on a "fusion
of "Spike Jones, vaudeville, gags, children's games, and
Marcel Duchamp."[31] Artists were not to have a professional
status in society and their works were meant to be accessible
to everyone. There is even a story, told by Dick Higgins, of
a janitor who worked at a museum where several Fluxus concerts
were staged who brought his children to every concert.[32]
The dadaist claim that art and life should not be separated
led Fluxus artists to a new genre of performance art. As early
as in 1959 George Brecht and Dick Higgins had been experimenting
with compositions consisting of a limited activity described
by a brief set of written instructions.[33] In 1960, La Monte
Young composed a series of works entitled Compositions 1960
that are sometimes called "short forms" or "word
pieces." These pieces, which were later called "events,"
consisted of an action that was initiated by a concise instruction
given to a performer. For example, Composition 1960 No. 2
tells the performer to build a fire in front of the audience.
In Composition 1960 No. 5 the performer lets a butterfly
loose in the concert hall. Composition 1960 No. 10 instructs
the reader to draw a straight line and follow it. Because they
usually involve only a single simple action, events should be
distinguished from "happenings" which more often involved
several simultaneous layers of activity. The reductionism characteristic
of "events" is historically significant because it
looked forward to the minimalist movement that gained momentum
several years later.
GO TO THE TOP OF THIS
PAGE
GO TO PREVIOUS
GO TO NEXT
|